Tag Archive: apple patents


Apple Stylus

When Steve Jobs first announced the revolutionary touch screen on the iPhone, one if the things he said was, “Who needs a stylus?” This was during a time when you couldn’t just tap a screen to get what you wanted. Mobile devices required a stylus and Apple freed us of those restrictions. Although the iPad works great with the tips of your fingers, we all know that a stylus can be a great improvement for handwritten notes, sketching, and even painting. Apple knows this too and recently applied for a patent on the design of an “Active Stylus” that would “significantly improve stylus sensing on a mutual capacitive touch sensor panel without incurring significant additional cost.”

U.S. Patent Application 20120327041, simply called “Active Stylus” is for the design of a stylus that includes an electrode at the tip and powered circuitry couple to the electrode that is configured for capacitively coupling the electrode with a capacity touch sensor panel.

According to the patent summary, traditional styluses work passively by blocking electric field line between the drive and sense electrodes. Apple considers the design in the patent as “active” because it can act as either a drive electrode to create an electric field between it and the sense lines of the sensor panel, or as a sense electrode for sensing the signals from one or more stimulated drive rows and columns of the sensor panel.

Although Jobs saw the touch panel as a way to throw off the shackles of stylus computing, Apple knew that the pen-like accessory would always be involved in our lives and now they want to do what they do best, improve upon it.

[Via: Patently Apple]

Using a couple of days of deliberations within the Apple company company as opposed to. Speak trial, this court came to decisions using a range of structure in addition to electricity patent breach claims brought in opposition to Speak by just Apple mackintosh, discovering a number of offenses by means of Samsung. The jury as well learned that Apple mackintosh was born with a number of industry dress up rights in the iPhone-namely, that a person elements new iphone4 models ended up being prominent plus protectable-and have been diluted from a part of Samsung’s things. Similar stated that iphone 4 not to mention ipad from apple make trades attire protects were not discovered to be well known and also protectable.All the jury was initially especially required to assess whether Straight talk samsung possessed infringed various Piece of fruit patents all around a diverse number of unique Sony tools, and specified a set of questions to reply to “yes” as well as “no” every Apple company company lumineux relating to each Straight talk samsung system. Whilst not every Speak product was found to obtain infringed each one of Apple’s patents, a wide range of Straight talk samsung gadgets were found to remain infringing one or more patents. Also, many different Samsung’s infringements used to be determined to come to be willful-not accidental-subjecting the company to increase bank charges. This court additionally declared that Check out the possessed failed to illustrate which Apple’s patents used to be sick, a potential defensive, and discovered the fact that Pear had not broke quite a few Straight talk patents, regardless of states by just Sony.Assessments various about regardless if Pear received additionally prevailed upon an antitrust assert with Straight talk samsung. As outlined by a say from CNET, that the jury found that Check out the have illicitly monopolized areas relating to the actual UMTS customary, although discovering that Fruit had not violated antitrust principles on UMTS.While a beginning record encouraged that will New samsung may be to blame for estimated at $2.5-billion found in damages or injuries with respect to infringements in a number of programs, this calculate satisfied which usually 100 % problems assessed towards Speak used to be from the $1.05-billion collection, and then because of the many infringing Check out the merchandise, the particular results seemingly would have to be re-checked following decision seemed to be read through. Mainly because Apple mackintosh is not came across in control of pretty much any offenses in New samsung patents, certainly no damages were examined contrary to the Cupertino business enterprise. [via CNET]In addition to in search of damages or injuries because of these violations, Iphone possesses got down to block out revenue for presumably infringing New samsung products, a conclusion that is getting still left on the assess normally. Delayed The apple company Head honcho Steve Jobs notoriously considered that your firm experienced desired patent shelter whatsoever the particular pioneer technology embodied through the new iphone4, in addition to patents now have consequently long been granted concerning many pieces of any new iphone4, and soon after appliances including apple ipod touch and also apple. Ongoing Apple company Top dog Ricky Make meals carries signaled that firm is going to in some circumstances permission patents, whilst in different events arranging the pioneer technology to make sure you Apple company company for its very own goods, plus suing firms that infringe.Pursuing the preference, Apple’s and also Samsung’s public relations coaches and teams every single produced claims, through Apple company adoring a court intended for studying an article it turned out “thrilled” to help “finally” convey to involving Samsung’s penalized by search engines for Apple’s items, and even New samsung hinting that how the “verdict will not be known as a win to get Apple company company, however , as a general impairment for any Western person,” simply because The apple company experienced copyrighted totally obvious principles of which “will be responsible for a lower number of alternatives, reduced uniqueness, and even doubtless substantial fees.”

%d bloggers like this: