Tag Archive: copyright


Now that the so-called “six-strikes” copyright alert system has gone into effect at the top US ISPs, we’re finally learning exactly how customers will be affected. Comcast has posted a brief overview of how it will handle things, and it involves a blatant browser hijack for repeated infringers.

According to Comcast, the first three incidents of alleged infringement will result in a browser popup that can be dismissed. On the fourth allegation, Comcast will hijack the browser completely and redirect users to a notice that cannot be dismissed. This is the beginning of the “mitigation phase.” Customers that reach this stage will have to call a Comcast Customer Security Assurance rep and discuss the matter. Exactly what is required to get the notice removed is not made clear.

The browser redirect should not affect any VoIP services or Comcast email — handy because the alert is accompanied by an email from Comcast with details of the alleged infringement. The company insists that at no point in the six-strikes system will a customer have their account terminated. However, browser hijacking makes a connection essentially unusable and presents security issues.

It’s only a matter of time before an internet ne’er-do-well comes up with a script that produces a window identical to Comcast’s notice. It would be trivial to stick malicious code into such a popup, or to simply trick users into paying a “fine.” Comcast says you can make sure the notice is legitimate by checking your Comcast email for the official message. This seems like a a fairly poor solution.

Comcast did not elaborate on how the browser hijack was being accomplished. If it is a simple DNS redirect, switching to a third-party DNS server (like Google or OpenDNS) would bypass it. If the ISP is somehow inserting JavaScript to take over the browser, blocking scripts could set things straight. If there is a way, the internet will find it.

Bloomberg has documented that a federal government jury- in the minute phase connected with an intellectual-property trial- has found this Google didn’t infringe on patents used by Oracle. On August 12, The new year, Oracle had charged Google for copyright laws and obvious infringement in excess of Mountain View’s enactment of the Java-like Dalvik online machine, an integral technology made use of by the Operating system operating system. Just how of the test, which wrapped up May Several, dealt with no matter if Google had infringed in Oracle’s copyrights. A court found that they had, but had been deadlocked on if thez infringement constituted truthful use. On Wednesday, your second part of the tryout wrapped up having a jury discovering that Google did not infringe about any patents. Consequently, the third part of the trial, wherever damages to the patent infringements might have been determined, won’t be necessary.The net/net is that Google is on the hook for the paltry $150,1000 for two copyright infringements. For comparison as well as a little schadenfreude , Oracle obtained first noted the value of your infringements worth up to $6B, proceeded to produce a accommodate at a $2.6B valuation, and finally visited trial using a $30M price tag. Naturally, this may not be no more it; although one would ought to question Oracle’s perception of experiencing any more legal fees at this stage. Mark Love, a strong Intellectual Property attorney sat down with by Bloomberg, portions it up quite succinctly “This case can be maybe something such as a near disaster with regard to Oracle”.

google ceo

Hit the break for any little more historical past on the Oracle/Sun/Java fable and why Oracle called “shenanigans” with Google.On 04 20th, 09, Sun Microsystems — the owner along with developer from the Java-branded suite involving products- announced that it had signed a definitive agreement using Oracle by which the latter would attain Sun with regard to $9.50 the share. Over our next year, the deal would be stuck by global antitrust concerns plus high-profile resignations. By the time purchasing was finish, Sun experienced lost Caffeine creator David Gosling, the entire JRuby company, and most of it is executive supervision team. Eric Schmidt experienced, of course, been recently a key staff member at Sunshine, rising to steer the software massive as its president before leaving in the late 90′s, finally becoming Google’s CEO.Fundamentally of the instance was Google’s utilization of the Dalvik Virtual Machine. Google has detailed the DVM as a clean-room implementation on the Java code-based digital machine, seo’ed to amass and execute byte code while in the Android system. DVM uses a register-based design, retrieving details and code from placed values through execution. The following results in a lower amount of information required to function (but a smaller amount code density) when compared to the bunch machine architectural mastery used by the actual Java Digital Machine. Dalvik doesn’t use Coffee ME class libraries, opting rather to use the actual open-source Apache Harmony inclusion. Oracle’s beef seemed to be that they assumed elements of Dalvik burned how the proprietary J2ME software interpreted in addition to executed the particular Java program code.

%d bloggers like this: