Tag Archive: data

Women sleep on their sides more often then men do, men are twice as likely to sleep naked, and most of us are guilty of bringing our mobile phones into the bedroom.


That’s according to Jawbone, the San Francisco-based maker of Bluetooth speakers and wearable technology. Jawbone surveyed a bunch of wearers of its Up wristband – which tracks sleep patterns, in addition to other things – and asked them for the less-snoozy details of their sleep habits.

One of the supposed benefits of these wearable devices is that, over time, the data shared can be used to provide deeper insight or more prescriptive solutions for how our bodies work. As I wrote in a column earlier this week about the Fitbit Force (a Jawbone Up competitor), all of this still feels very much like Activity Tracking 1.1, not quite Wearables 2.0. So it’s early days.

Jawbone has put together a bright-green infographic with its findings, but I’ll summarize some key points for you:

  • 80 percent of Up wearers sleep with a mobile phone in the bedroom.
  • Those with partners go to bed on average 35 minutes earlier than those who sleep alone.
  • The typical woman sleeps with two pillows, the typical man with one.
  • Women are three times as likely as men to sleep in socks.
  • Men like to sleep naked. See above.
  • Men are 19 percent more likely to browse the Internet after 5 pm.
  • And men are eight times more likely than women to have their beds made for them. Yes, really. You’d think while we were all busy leaning in and stuff that dudes would have learned the hospital tuck by now.

A couple of caveats here: First, the three sample sizes that Jawbone pulled from were relatively small, each ranging from 300 to 500 people.

And, these are all people who actively track their sleep using the Jawbone Up, but since the band or app isn’t going to track things like whether you’re wearing socks, this is all self-reported data. I’m not sure which I’d find more reliable – self-reported data or data gathered by the device itself.

To that point, the sleep-tracking capabilities of these kinds of wearable devices might be less than precise. Some experts are skeptical. Casey Johnson of Ars Technica put it well in her wearables comparison when she wrote that, as irresistible as the sleep-tracking wristbands are to her, “I will preface this … by saying that I’m aware of how fuzzy the science of sleep-logging done by a fitness-tracking band worn on your wrist must inherently be. Sleep logging, done right by scientists, is a pretty complicated thing.”

But it’s easy to see the potential usefulness of this sort of (opt-in) data if there’s more of it. In the infographic, Jawbone links nighttime Internet browsing with later bedtimes – not a shocking revelation, but something that sleep scientists have weighed in on, as well.


Is it over for paid mobile apps? That’s the general thinking these days, as the App Stores fill up with “good enough” alternatives to paid apps, while major publishers game the charts with free offerings that make millions which can then be used for their ongoing user acquisition efforts. That’s one of the reasons why the top charts of the App Store have gotten so difficult to break into for new publishers today, in fact.

The evidence for the trend toward free apps was rehashed again in a series of blog posts and other online discussions over this past weekend, written by those in the know – app developers themselves who are today still trying to make things work. But the data presented was largely anecdotal. App developer David Smith and his wife spoke spoke it. Elsewhere, Instapaper founder Marco Arment wrote about his struggles to determine the appropriate business model for his own new app, Overcast.

These were more personal tellings of the same story which has been reported through harder data for months on end. But that data contains some nuances which shouldn’t be ignored, especially for paid app developers trying to squeeze out profits from a less competitive niche. Yes, apps overall are trending toward free, and a majority of the App Store is composed of free apps – but there are a few areas where a paid app might still work…at least, for now.


Going back a few months, analytics firm Flurry reported this July what the shift toward free applications looked like at the time. From 2010 to 2012, the proportion of free apps on the App Store ranged from 80% to 84%, but by early 2013, that had grown to 90%. And 6% of paid apps fell into the 99 cents price point.

At the time of the original report, Flurry noted that it seemed like people wanted free content more than they wanted to avoid ads, or have the highest quality experience possible.

According to Flurry’s Director of Research, Mary Ellen Gordon, PhD., the most compelling piece of evidence to support the shift to free was Flurry’s observations of developer A/B testing. They watched as developers experimented with different price points over the past months, finally resolving themselves to free apps, often supported by in-app purchases.

“It suggests that developers are not just moving to free apps because everyone else is or it seems like the thing to do. Many of them have actually tested different price points,” she tells TechCrunch. “Based on the trends, I would guess that by next year the (weighted) percentage of apps that are free will be somewhere between 91% and 93% – greater than it is now, but not 100% because there will probably always be certain specialized apps that are able to charge for downloads.”


So where might paid apps still have a shot? In other words, are there categories where those specialized apps are selling? We spoke to app analytics firm Distimo, which examined grossing data on the App Store’s leaderboards to determine where paid apps are doing well.

In the following categories, the firm found that at least half, if not more of the top ten apps are currently paid: Productivity, Medical, Business, Healthcare & Fitness, Navigation, Catalogs, Lifestyle, Photo & Video, Travel, and Weather. In some cases, paid apps also use in-app purchases to drive up revenue even further.

What’s interesting about this list is that it’s very utilitarian, for the most part. These apps about are about getting something done – booking travel, dealing with your health, checking the weather, working, photo editing – things users do often enough to make it worth paying for the upgraded experience or additional features beyond what you could get in a free version.

Notably absent, of course, are several of the larger App Store categories, like Games and Social Networking. Minecraft was the only top grossing game that was also paid, and Grindr Xtra was the only top grossing social app that was paid. In addition, highly grossing applications in Books and Newsstand categories also tended to be free applications to start.

In general, however, Distimo’s data confirmed Flurry’s in that it found free applications led most categories, with in-app purchases as a main driver of monetization, and this was especially true in the Games category. In addition, 67 percent of the current top 10 apps across all categories combined use in-app purchasing today.

Paid apps aren’t going away entirely, says Distimo, but getting traction for a paid application will depend on a number of things, including target audience, category, competition, and more – just like in any business.

Still, Distimo’s analysis focused on the top of the charts, so it doesn’t necessarily paint the most accurate picture for what it’s like for a smaller or medium-sized developer competing today. Breaking into the top charts is often a function of marketing dollars, and money spent on user acquisition strategies, as well as a combination of more subjective things, like app quality, social impression, utility, and of course, luck.

At least breaking into the top charts on the App Store is easier for paid app makers, in terms of sheer number of downloads, that is. According to other data from this summer, getting into the top 10 requires around 4,000 downloads for paid apps, versus 70,000 for free apps. Getting into the top 50 only required 950 downloads for paid apps, versus 23,000 for free apps. Some of these figures were basically reconfirmed this month, when a well-known developer Readdle reported it took between 3,500 and 3,800 downloads to break into a top ten paid app list on the App Store.

The window for paid apps is definitely getting smaller, but there are still a few success stories out there to analyze, for developers determined to try the paid upfront business model. Yet even then, developers have to make sure they don’t alienate their current user base, if launching an upgraded experience as the new paid app, like Clear just did before having to change its course.

In the long run, unless a paid app doing something unique and notably better in a less competitive niche, consumers are looking for the free apps first.

Developers lament this trend, noting that most paid apps are worth less than a cup of coffee, and that’s a “hard pill to swallow,” as developer Florian Kugler recently put it in a widely circulated post on Hacker News.

From a user’s standpoint, though, it’s not about whether that app is worth the money, it’s about how that money adds up over time. There are nearly a million apps to choose from now – who can afford to buy a new one every day or every few days, the way you do a cup of coffee? Come to think of it, if you’re buying a fancy latte every day instead of snagging the free stuff from the break room on occasion, then you might have some other financial management issues, too.

Data Cable USB 2.0 (Olympus CB-USB4, Nikon UC-E4, Kodak U-5A, Canon IFC-300PCU,IFC-400PCU ,Sony VMC-14UMB2,Pentax I-USB6 for Ricoh camera

  • The USB2.0 certified cable supports data transfer rates up to 480 Mbps.
  • Compatible with all USB 1.0 and 1.1 devices.
  • Ideal USB connection for portable use
  • Easy to use plug and play.
  • Universal Supports Windows Vista/XP/ME/2000/98 and Mac OS X 10.2 & up Linux 9

Data Cable USB 2.0 (Olympus CB-USB4, Nikon UC-E4, Kodak U-5A, Canon IFC-300PCU,IFC-400PCU ,Sony VMC-14UMB2,Pentax I-USB6 for Ricoh camera . Digital Camera Data Cable USB 2.0 Olympus CB-USB4, Nikon UC-E4, Kodak U-5A, Canon IFC-300PCU,IFC-400PCU ,Sony VMC-14UMB2,Pentax I-USB6,SAMSUNG AH39-00498AG)for you to use to connect your digital device to your laptop, PC computer to transfer photos and other files that support by the digital device.With the charging function, you can also charge your digital


10 feet iPhone / iPod cable. It is convenient, easy to use, and 100% compatible with the existing iPhones, Pods and iPads.

USB Data Hot Sync Straight Cable for the Olympus FE-4030 Digital Camera with Charge Function – Two functions in one unique Gomadic TipExchange enabled cable

  • Supports USB 1.1, 2.0 and 3.0 transfer standards.
  • Specification: Cable length: (50″), Outer Shell Material: (Flexible PU), Internal Leads: 24AWG, TipExchange Connector Design (Olympus FE-4030 Digital Camera Specific)
  • Flexible cable measures 50″ in total length. Included connector tip, wiring and power configuration is unique to Olympus FE-4030 Digital Camera specifications.
  • Upgradeable TipExchange Technology protects your investment by providing a mechanism to upgrade the physical connector to adapt your cable to work with other devices in the future. (Additional connector tips sold separately).
  • No additional AC power required. Uses power from the USB port of the computer to charge the Olympus FE-4030 Digital Camera.

Charge the Olympus FE-4030 Digital Camera while synchronizing data with our unique Gomadic Hot Sync and Charge Straight USB cable. Cut loose the rest of the cords protruding from your PC to make this cable the hub of your mobile workstation and enjoy a minimalist workspace anywhere you go. Built using the unique Gomadic TipExchange Technology, this cable is not like the others in that the same cable can be used to work with thousands of additional devices by simply changing the physical connecto

%d bloggers like this: