Tag Archive: Patent infringement


“We are now less than two months away from the big Apple v. Samsung post-trial hearing at which the parties will try to convince Judge Koh of their positions on what consequences the jury trial should have (or whether there should be a whole new trial, which is Samsung’s preference),” Florian Mueller writes for FOSS Patents.

“Besides issues relating to remedies and ways in which the court might overrule the jury as a matter of law, non-jury claims will also be on the agenda after Judge Koh granted an Apple motion to brief its non-jury FRAND defenses and claims separately from the other post-trial issues and also allowed Samsung to bring such claims,” Mueller writes. “It was clear from the beginning that Samsung’s primary interest was to receive more space for its post-trial argument. Having lost on the vast majority of issues put before the jury, Samsung has so much Rule 50 (overrule-the-jury) stuff to raise that its Rule 50 motion per se just consists of conclusory statements and references to previously-filed documents.”

Mueller writes, “Apple has fewer Rule 50 issues and can afford the luxury of making a more elaborate and coherent case… “

Much more in the full article here.

Bloomberg has documented that a federal government jury- in the minute phase connected with an intellectual-property trial- has found this Google didn’t infringe on patents used by Oracle. On August 12, The new year, Oracle had charged Google for copyright laws and obvious infringement in excess of Mountain View’s enactment of the Java-like Dalvik online machine, an integral technology made use of by the Operating system operating system. Just how of the test, which wrapped up May Several, dealt with no matter if Google had infringed in Oracle’s copyrights. A court found that they had, but had been deadlocked on if thez infringement constituted truthful use. On Wednesday, your second part of the tryout wrapped up having a jury discovering that Google did not infringe about any patents. Consequently, the third part of the trial, wherever damages to the patent infringements might have been determined, won’t be necessary.The net/net is that Google is on the hook for the paltry $150,1000 for two copyright infringements. For comparison as well as a little schadenfreude , Oracle obtained first noted the value of your infringements worth up to $6B, proceeded to produce a accommodate at a $2.6B valuation, and finally visited trial using a $30M price tag. Naturally, this may not be no more it; although one would ought to question Oracle’s perception of experiencing any more legal fees at this stage. Mark Love, a strong Intellectual Property attorney sat down with by Bloomberg, portions it up quite succinctly “This case can be maybe something such as a near disaster with regard to Oracle”.

google ceo

Hit the break for any little more historical past on the Oracle/Sun/Java fable and why Oracle called “shenanigans” with Google.On 04 20th, 09, Sun Microsystems — the owner along with developer from the Java-branded suite involving products- announced that it had signed a definitive agreement using Oracle by which the latter would attain Sun with regard to $9.50 the share. Over our next year, the deal would be stuck by global antitrust concerns plus high-profile resignations. By the time purchasing was finish, Sun experienced lost Caffeine creator David Gosling, the entire JRuby company, and most of it is executive supervision team. Eric Schmidt experienced, of course, been recently a key staff member at Sunshine, rising to steer the software massive as its president before leaving in the late 90′s, finally becoming Google’s CEO.Fundamentally of the instance was Google’s utilization of the Dalvik Virtual Machine. Google has detailed the DVM as a clean-room implementation on the Java code-based digital machine, seo’ed to amass and execute byte code while in the Android system. DVM uses a register-based design, retrieving details and code from placed values through execution. The following results in a lower amount of information required to function (but a smaller amount code density) when compared to the bunch machine architectural mastery used by the actual Java Digital Machine. Dalvik doesn’t use Coffee ME class libraries, opting rather to use the actual open-source Apache Harmony inclusion. Oracle’s beef seemed to be that they assumed elements of Dalvik burned how the proprietary J2ME software interpreted in addition to executed the particular Java program code.

%d bloggers like this: